This video, from Fox News, explores whether states can use legal precedents rather than voters' rulings to determine same-sex marriage laws, such as in California and New York. The short video features testimony from a legal expert who cites statistics that the vast majority of people think that votes and not courts should decide this. This provides an interesting ethics angle not often explored by gay organizations and think tanks.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Multimedia resources
"Landmark decision?" Video (produced 2008 ). New York, NY: . (From Fox News, 2008, May 29)http://search2.foxnews.com/search?access=p&getfields=*&sort=date%3AD%3AS%3Ad1&output=xml_no_dtd&ie=UTF-8&client=my_frontend&filter=0&site=video&proxystylesheet=my_frontend&q=gay%20marriage.
This video, from Fox News, explores whether states can use legal precedents rather than voters' rulings to determine same-sex marriage laws, such as in California and New York. The short video features testimony from a legal expert who cites statistics that the vast majority of people think that votes and not courts should decide this. This provides an interesting ethics angle not often explored by gay organizations and think tanks.
This video, from Fox News, explores whether states can use legal precedents rather than voters' rulings to determine same-sex marriage laws, such as in California and New York. The short video features testimony from a legal expert who cites statistics that the vast majority of people think that votes and not courts should decide this. This provides an interesting ethics angle not often explored by gay organizations and think tanks.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment